Bias in Estimates of Quantitative-Trait–Locus Effect in Genome Scans: Demonstration of the Phenomenon and a Method-of-Moments Procedure for Reducing Bias
AUTOR(ES)
Allison, David B.
FONTE
The American Society of Human Genetics
RESUMO
An attractive feature of variance-components methods (including the Haseman-Elston tests) for the detection of quantitative-trait loci (QTL) is that these methods provide estimates of the QTL effect. However, estimates that are obtained by commonly used methods can be biased for several reasons. Perhaps the largest source of bias is the selection process. Generally, QTL effects are reported only at locations where statistically significant results are obtained. This conditional reporting can lead to a marked upward bias. In this article, we demonstrate this bias and show that its magnitude can be large. We then present a simple method-of-moments (MOM)–based procedure to obtain more-accurate estimates, and we demonstrate its validity via Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, limitations of the MOM approach are noted, and we discuss some alternative procedures that may also reduce bias.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=384937Documentos Relacionados
- Quantitative-Trait-Locus Analysis of Body-Mass Index and of Stature, by Combined Analysis of Genome Scans of Five Finnish Study Groups
- Regression-Based Quantitative-Trait–Locus Mapping in the 21st Century
- Recent Developments in Genomewide Association Scans: A Workshop Summary and Review
- Correcting the Bias of Wright's Estimates of the Number of Genes Affecting a Quantitative Character: A Further Improved Method
- Large Upward Bias in Estimation of Locus-Specific Effects from Genomewide Scans