Comparison of Atomic Force Microscopy Interaction Forces between Bacteria and Silicon Nitride Substrata for Three Commonly Used Immobilization Methods

AUTOR(ES)

Vadillo-Rodríguez, Virginia

FONTE

American Society for Microbiology

RESUMO

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has emerged as a powerful technique for mapping the surface morphology of biological specimens, including bacterial cells. Besides creating topographic images, AFM enables us to probe both physicochemical and mechanical properties of bacterial cell surfaces on a nanometer scale. For AFM, bacterial cells need to be firmly anchored to a substratum surface in order to withstand the friction forces from the silicon nitride tip. Different strategies for the immobilization of bacteria have been described in the literature. This paper compares AFM interaction forces obtained between Klebsiella terrigena and silicon nitride for three commonly used immobilization methods, i.e., mechanical trapping of bacteria in membrane filters, physical adsorption of negatively charged bacteria to a positively charged surface, and glutaraldehyde fixation of bacteria to the tip of the microscope. We have shown that different sample preparation techniques give rise to dissimilar interaction forces. Indeed, the physical adsorption of bacterial cells on modified substrata may promote structural rearrangements in bacterial cell surface structures, while glutaraldehyde treatment was shown to induce physicochemical and mechanical changes on bacterial cell surface properties. In general, mechanical trapping of single bacterial cells in filters appears to be the most reliable method for immobilization.

Documentos Relacionados

• The relationship between ligand-binding thermodynamics and protein-ligand interaction forces measured by atomic force microscopy.
• Cadherin interaction probed by atomic force microscopy
• Structure and dynamics of three-way DNA junctions: atomic force microscopy studies
• Atomic force microscopy of DNA and bacteriophage in air, water and propanol: the role of adhesion forces.
• Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning: a scanning electron microscopy