Influência da técnica de microinfiltração, pressão pulpar simulada, armazenamento e fadiga cíclica na microinfiltração e integridade marginal das coroas In-Ceram Alumina / Influence of microleakage technique, simulated pulpal pressure, water storage, and cyclic fatigue on marginal integrity and microleakage of In-Ceram alumina crowns

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2007

RESUMO

Objectives: To verify the influence of microleakage technique, simulated pulpal pressure, water storage and cyclic fatigue on marginal integrity and microleakage of In-Ceram alumina crowns. Material and methods: Human premolar teeth of similar dimensions received complete crown preparation with a 6 convergence degree, 4mm-height and 2mm of axial and occlusal reduction. In-Ceram alumina copings 0.5mm-thick were obtained and cemented either with Panavia F/Clearfil SE Bond (PAN-SE) or Rely XARC/Adper Single Bond 2 (REL-SB). Four hypotheses were made: 1) No difference between a new technique and a standard one to verify microleakage, 1.1) To verify if a new microleakage technique is adequate for laboratorial studies; 2) Simulated pulpal pressure (15cmH2O) does not alter microleakage; 3) Water storage (90 days) / cyclic fatigue (500.000 cycles, 2Hz, 5kg) does not have influence on microleakage and 4) Water storage/cyclic fatigue does not influence marginal integrity of crowns. Control groups were established for all experiments. Results: 1) No statistically significant difference was detected between the two techniques to assess microleakage in each cement/adhesive combination; 2) Simulated pulpal pressure significantly altered microleakage for PAN-SE (Mann-Whitney, p=0.025) and REL-SB (Mann-Whitney, p=0.014); 3) Water storage (Mann-Whitney, p=0.032) and water storage/cyclic fatigue (Mann-Whitney, p=0.008) significantly increased microleakage only in PAN-SE groups. These parameters were not decisive in REL-SB groups even with higher microleakage values, and 4) Loss of marginal integrity was of 4% and 10% in REL-SB and PAN-SE groups, respectively. Conclusions: 1) No differences on microleakage were observed when a new technique suggest to assess microleakage was compared to a standard one. 1.1) This new technique seems adequate for laboratorial microleakage studies; 2) Simulated pulpal pressure significantly altered microleakage values for both adhesives/cements; 3) Water storage/cyclic fatigue influenced on microleakage of Panavia F and 4) Water storage/cyclic fatigue did not have influence on marginal integrity of both adhesives/cements tested.

ASSUNTO(S)

armazenamento em água cimentos de resina water pressure fadiga fatigue aluminum oxide ceramics polpa dentária dental leakage water storage infiltração dentária resin cements dental pulp pressão da água cerâmica Óxido de alumínio

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados