Role of re-screening of cervical smears in internal quality control.

AUTOR(ES)

Baker, A

RESUMO

AIMS--To investigate the use of rapid re-screening as a quality control method for previously screened cervical slides; to compare this method with 10% random re-screening and clinically indicated double screening. METHODS--Between June 1990 and December 1994, 117,890 negative smears were subjected to rapid re-screening. RESULTS--This study shows that rapid re-screening detects far greater numbers of false negative cases when compared with both 10% random re-screening and clinically indicated double screening, with no additional demand on human resources. The technique also identifies variation in the performance of screening personnel as an additional benefit. CONCLUSION--Rapid re-screening is an effective method of quality control. Although less sensitive, rapid re-screening should replace 10% random re-screening and selected re-screening as greater numbers of false negative results are detected while consuming less resources.

Documentos Relacionados

• Serological screening for sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy: is there any value in re-screening for HIV and syphilis at the time of delivery?
• Internal quality assurance in a clinical virology laboratory. II. Internal quality control.
• Preparation of acid-fast microscopy smears for proficiency testing and quality control.
• Regional quality control.
• Human papillomavirus in false negative archival cervical smears: implications for screening for cervical cancer.