Validation of Portuguese version of Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ) and comparison to International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and RAND 36-Item Health Survey
AUTOR(ES)
Reis, Ana Luiza, Reis, Leonardo Oliveira, Saade, Ricardo Destro, Santos Jr., Carlos Alberto, Lima, Marcelo Lopes de, Fregonesi, Adriano
FONTE
Int. braz j urol.
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2015-02
RESUMO
Purpose To validate the Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ) considering Brazilian social-cultural aspects. Materials and Methods To determine equivalence between the Portuguese and the English QEQ versions, the Portuguese version was back-translated by two professors who are native English speakers. After language equivalence had been determined, urologists considered the QEQ Portuguese version suitable. Men with self-reported erectile dysfunction (ED) and infertile men who had a stable sexual relationship for at least 6 months were invited to answer the QEQ, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36). The questionnaires were presented together and answered without help in a private room. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), test-retest reliability (Spearman), convergent validity (Spearman correlation) coefficients and known-groups validity (the ability of the QEQ Portuguese version to differentiate erectile dysfunction severity groups) were assessed. Results We recruited 197 men (167 ED patients and 30 non-ED patients), mean age of 53.3 and median of 55.5 years (23-82 years). The Portuguese version of the QEQ had high internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.93), high stability between test and retest (ICC 0.83, with IC 95%: 0.76-0.88, p<0.001) and Spearman correlation coefficient r=0.82 (p<0.001), which demonstrated the high correlation between the QEQ and IIEF results. The correlations between the QEQ and RAND-36 were significantly low in ED (r=0.20, p=0.01) and non-ED patients (r=0.37, p=0.04). Conclusion The QEQ Portuguese version presented good psychometric properties and high convergent validity in relation to IIEF. The low correlations between the QEQ and the RAND-36, as well as between the IIEF and the RAND-36 indicated IIEF and QEQ specificity, which may have resulted from the patients’ psychological adaptations that minimized the impact of ED on Quality of Life (QoL) and reestablished the well-being feeling.
Documentos Relacionados
- Validation of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey questionnaire in Brazil
- Validity and reliability of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire version 2 among people living with HIV in Brazil
- Quality of life in sickle cell disease: assessments by the 36-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire and Beck Depression Inventory
- The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): translation and validation study of the Iranian version
- Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey e Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression em idosos com úlcera por pressão